당신은 주제를 찾고 있습니까 “kr security council – Non-Proliferation/DPR Korea – Security Council“? 다음 카테고리의 웹사이트 ppa.pilgrimjournalist.com 에서 귀하의 모든 질문에 답변해 드립니다: ppa.pilgrimjournalist.com/blog. 바로 아래에서 답을 찾을 수 있습니다. 작성자 United Nations 이(가) 작성한 기사에는 조회수 6,196회 및 좋아요 124개 개의 좋아요가 있습니다.
Table of Contents
kr security council 주제에 대한 동영상 보기
여기에서 이 주제에 대한 비디오를 시청하십시오. 주의 깊게 살펴보고 읽고 있는 내용에 대한 피드백을 제공하세요!
d여기에서 Non-Proliferation/DPR Korea – Security Council – kr security council 주제에 대한 세부정보를 참조하세요
United Nations Security Council on Non-Proliferation/DPR Korea:
Speakers to include the UN Secretary-General António Guterres, Foreign Minister of Japan Taro Kono, US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson and more.
Read More:
UN chief stresses need to denuclearize Korean Peninsula, avoid ‘sleepwalking into war’
http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=58294
Watch more Live and on-demand events in six languages directly from UN Web TV at: http://webtv.un.org
مشاهدة المزيد من الأحداث الحية وعند الطلب في اللغة العربية مباشر من تلفزيون الأمم المتحدة على شبكة الإنترنت
: http://webtv.un.org
欲览更多联合国会议与活动的中文直播与回放内容，请访问联合国网络电视主页：http://webtv.un.org
Regardez plus d’événements en direct et à la demande en Français directement de UN Web TV sur: http://webtv.un.org
Vea más eventos en directo y a la carta en español directamente desde la Web TV de la ONU en: http://webtv.un.org
Смотрите больше прямых трансляций и видеозаписей на русском языке на Веб-телевидении ООН: http://webtv.un.org.
kr security council 주제에 대한 자세한 내용은 여기를 참조하세요.
KR Security Council (@KRSCPress) / Twitter
KR Security Council. @KRSCPress. Oversees security and intelligence community in Kurdistan Region and coordinates coalition airstrikes against ISIL.
Source: twitter.com
Date Published: 12/8/2021
View: 7092
United Nations Security Council |
The Security Council has primary responsibility for the maintenance of international peace and security. It has 15 Members, and each Member has one vote.
Source: www.un.org
Date Published: 3/22/2022
View: 4788
Korea Refers the Cheonan Issue to the Security Council View
Korea Refers the Cheonan Issue to the Security Council · 1. On June 4 (New York time), the Korean government submitted a letter signed by the Korean
Source: www.mofa.go.kr
Date Published: 8/24/2022
View: 6022
UN Security Council Resolutions on North Korea
The United Nations monitors implementation of North Korea sanctions through the 1718 Committee, established by Security Council Resolution 1718 in 2006 and a …
Source: www.armscontrol.org
Date Published: 4/19/2021
View: 127
Can the UN Command and Security Council play roles for …
Can the UN Command and Security Council play roles for peace in Korea? Photo: Lt.-Gen. Wayne Eyre, deputy commander of the United Nations Command, speaks during …
Source: www.unfoldzero.org
Date Published: 12/27/2021
View: 7576
UN Security Council sets vote on tougher North Korea sanctions
The United Nations Security Council will vote on a push by the United States to strengthen sanctions on North Korea over a spate of recent …
Source: www.aljazeera.com
Date Published: 5/17/2022
View: 7535
주제와 관련된 이미지 kr security council
주제와 관련된 더 많은 사진을 참조하십시오 Non-Proliferation/DPR Korea – Security Council. 댓글에서 더 많은 관련 이미지를 보거나 필요한 경우 더 많은 관련 기사를 볼 수 있습니다.
주제에 대한 기사 평가 kr security council
- Author: United Nations
- Views: 조회수 6,196회
- Likes: 좋아요 124개
- Date Published: 실시간 스트리밍 시작일: 2017. 12. 15.
- Video Url link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Vx4DLq9ATg
JavaScript is not available.
We’ve detected that JavaScript is disabled in this browser. Please enable JavaScript or switch to a supported browser to continue using twitter.com. You can see a list of supported browsers in our Help Center.
Help Center
UN Security Council Resolutions on North Korea
Contact: Kelsey Davenport, Director for Nonproliferation Policy, (202) 463-8270 x102
The United Nations Security Council has adopted nine major sanctions resolutions on North Korea in response to the country’s nuclear and missile activities since 2006.
Each resolution condemns North Korea’s latest nuclear and ballistic missile activity and calls on North Korea to cease its illicit activity, which violates previous UN Security Council resolutions. All nine resolutions were unanimously adopted by the Security Council and all but Resolution 2087 (January 2013) contain references to acting under Chapter VII, Article 41 of the United Nations Charter.
In addition to imposing sanctions, the resolutions give UN member states the authority to interdict and inspect North Korean cargo within their territory, and subsequently seize and dispose of illicit shipments.
The resolutions also call upon North Korea to rejoin the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), which it acceded to in 1985 but withdrew from in 2003 after U.S. allegations that the country was pursuing an illegal uranium enrichment program. The Security Council also has called for North Korea to return to negotiations in the Six-Party Talks, which include South Korea, North Korea, China, Japan, Russia and the United States. The Six-Party talks, which took place from 2003-2009, resulted in a joint statement on denuclearization. North Korea also dismantled its plutonium-producing reactor as part of the process, although it has subsequently restarted the reactor. For more on the Six-Party talks, click here.
The United Nations monitors implementation of North Korea sanctions through the 1718 Committee, established by Security Council Resolution 1718 in 2006 and a Panel of Experts, established by Security Council Resolution 1874 in 2009. The panel produces regular reports to the Security Council on the status of the sanctions and enforcement.
Prior to passing the first sanctions resolution in 2006, the Security Council passed several resolutions condemning North Korea’s nuclear and missile activities. In response to North Korea’s announcement of intent to withdraw from the NPT in 1993, the Security Council passed Resolution 825, urging North Korea to remain party to the NPT and to honor its nonproliferation obligations under the treaty. Resolution 1695 was passed in 2006 in response to ballistic missile launches in July, and calls on North Korea to suspend activities related to its ballistic missile program. Additional Security Council resolutions on North Korea serve to extend the 1718 Committee mandate. They are not included in this list, but can be found here.
Security Council Resolution 1718
Resolution 1718 was unanimously adopted by the UN Security Council on October 14, 2006, shortly after North Korea’s first nuclear test on October 9. The full text of Resolution 1718 is available here.
Resolution 1718’s Principal Provisions
Resolution 1718:
Demands North Korea refrain from further nuclear or missile tests.
Demands North Korea return to the NPT.
Decides North Korea shall suspend all ballistic missile activities.
Decides North Korea shall abandon its nuclear program in a “complete, verifiable, and irreversible” manner.
Decides North Korea shall abandon all WMD activities.
Calls upon North Korea to return to the Six-Party Talks.
Resolution 1718’s Principal Sanctions
Member states are prohibited from the “direct or indirect supply, sale, or transfer” to North Korea, of:
Heavy weaponry, such as tanks, armored vehicles, large caliber artillery, combat aircraft, attack helicopters, warships and missile systems
Spare parts for the above mentioned heavy weaponry
Materials and technologies that could contribute to North Korea’s WMD programs and ballistic missile related activities, as set out in prior Security Council documents
Luxury goods
Member states are also required to:
Freeze the funds or financial assets of entities designated by the Security Council as providing support for North Korea’s nuclear, missile, and other WMD programs
Resolution 1718’s Monitoring Mechanisms
The resolution established a committee composed of the 15 current members of the Security Council to function as a monitoring body to review and adjust the imposed sanctions and violations of the sanctions. The body was to provide a report on the status of sanctions implementation every 90 days.
Back to the top.
Security Council Resolution 1874
Resolution 1874 was unanimously adopted by the UN Security Council on June 12, 2009, shortly after North Korea’s second nuclear test, which took place May 25. The full text of Resolution 1874 is available here.
Resolution 1874’s Principal Provisions
The resolution reiterated a number of provisions from Resolution 1718. It also called upon North Korea to join the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty.
Resolution 1874’s Principal Sanctions
Sanctions in Resolution 1874 built off several measures first laid out in Resolution 1718. The resolution expanded the arms embargo by banning all imports and exports of weapons, excluding small arms (which required Security Council notification).
Member states were also authorized to:
Inspect North Korea cargo on land, air, and sea, if the state has reason to believe that it contains prohibited items and seize any prohibited materials or technologies
Prohibit bunkering services for North Korean ships if the state has reason to believe it is carrying illicit cargo
In addition, member states were called upon to:
Prohibit public financial support for trade with North Korea that would contributed to nuclear, ballistic missile, or WMD-related activities
Refuse new loads or credit to North Korea, except for humanitarian or development purposes
Resolution 1874’s Monitoring Mechanisms
Resolution 1874 set up a seven-member expert panel to assist the sanctions committee in enforcing the resolution and monitor implementation. Known as the ‘Panel of Experts,’ the group was initially given a mandate for one year and was required to report regularly to the Sanctions Committee on possible violations and recommendations for improving implementation. Later resolutions extended the mandate of the Panel of Experts.
Back to the top.
Security Council Resolution 2087
The Security Council unanimously adopted Resolution 2087 on January 22, 2013 after a successful North Korean satellite launch on December 12, 2012. The launch was a violation of Resolutions 1718 (2006) and 1874 (2009), which prohibited any further development of technology applicable to North Korea’s ballistic missile programs. The full text of Resolution 2087 is available here.
Resolution 2087’s Principal Provisions
Resolution 2087 called for other states to “remain vigilant” in monitoring individuals and entities associated with the North Korean regime. It also directed the sanctions committee to issue an Implementation Assistance Notice if a vessel refused to allow an inspection authorized by its flag state.
Resolution 2087’s Principal Sanctions
Resolution 2087 built on sanctions included in Resolutions 1718 and 1874 including:
Clarifying the catch-all provision
Clarifying the state’s right to seize and destroy material suspected of heading to or from North Korea
Directing the sanctions committee to take action to designate individuals or entities that have assisted in sanctions evasion
Resolution 2087 also listed individuals subject now to the travel ban and asset freeze penalties, and entities subject to the asset freeze penalties, for violations under Resolutions 1718 and 1874.
Resolution 2087’s Monitoring Mechanisms
No new monitoring mechanisms were included in Resolution 2087.
Back to the top.
Security Council Resolution 2094
The Security Council unanimously adopted Resolution 2094 on March 7, 2013 in response to North Korea’s third nuclear test on February 12, 2013. The full text of the resolution is available here.
Resolution 2094’s Principal Provisions
Unlike prior resolutions, 2094 explicitly mentioned North Korea’s uranium enrichment in its condemnation of Pyongyang’s nuclear activities.
Additionally, this resolution
Expressed concern that North Korea was abusing immunities granted to its diplomats by the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic and Consular Relations
Welcomed the Financial Action Task Force’s new recommendation on targeted financial sanctions related to proliferation and urged member states to apply the recommendations
Resolution 2094’s Principal Sanctions
Resolution 2094 expands a number of sanctions measures from earlier resolutions, such as adding nuclear and missile dual-use technologies and luxury goods to the list of banned imports.
Resolution 2094 also designated additional individuals and entities for asset freezes and the travel ban and expanded the designation criteria to include persons or entities suspected of acting on the behalf or controlled by any persons or entities already sanctioned.
The resolution aims to make it more difficult for North Korea to make further progress in its nuclear and ballistic missile programs by hindering its access to hard cash and technological equipment needed to build weapons and pursue uranium enrichment.
The resolution also strengthened the interdiction and oversight authorities for member states by:
calling for states to inspect and detain any suspected cargo or shipments to or from North Korea that transit through their territory, if the cargo is suspected to contain bulk cash or material that could be used in a nuclear program.
Directing states to enhance vigilance over North Korea’s diplomatic personnel
New financial sanctions included in the resolution:
blocked the North Korea regime from bulk cash transfers
restricted North Korea’s ties to international banking systems
Resolution 2094’s Monitoring Mechanisms
The resolution expanded the panel of experts that assesses implementation of UN Security Council sanctions on North Korea to eight people.
Back to the top.
Security Council Resolution 2270
The Security Council unanimously adopted Resolution 2270 on March 2, 2016 after North Korea conducted a fourth nuclear test and launched a satellite for the second time. The full text of the resolution can be found here.
Resolution 2270’s Principal Provisions
Resolution 2270:
Prohibits states from providing any specialized teaching or training of North Korean nationals in disciplines which could contribute to North Korea’s proliferation.
Emphasizes that the North Korean regime has seriously neglected to meet the needs of the North Korean people and has instead prioritized development of its nuclear weapons and ballistic missile programs.
Decides that North Korea shall abandon all chemical and biological weapons and programs and act in accordance with the Biological Weapons Convention and the Chemical Weapons Convention
Resolution 2270’s Principal Sanctions
Resolution 2270 builds upon sanctions measures from prior resolutions, including:
Expanding the arms embargo to include small arms and light weapons
Prohibiting North Korea from servicing and repairing any weaponry sold to third parties
Prohibiting additional luxury goods
Resolution 2270 also expands interdiction and inspection authority for member states to:
Mandatory inspections on cargo destined to or originating from North Korea
Asset freeze on all North Korean government and Worker’s Party entities associated with prohibited activities
Resolution 2270 also designated an additional 16 individuals and 12 entitles for asset freezes and travel bans.
New financial sanctions place limits on banking activities of North Korean entities abroad including:
Prohibiting UN member states from hosting North Korean financial institutions that may be supporting proliferation activities in North Korea
Prohibiting states from opening new financial institutions or bank branches in North Korea
Requiring states to terminate existing joint ventures within ninety days of the adoption of the resolution
It also requires that member states repatriate North Korean or other foreign nationals found to be working on behalf of a Security Council resolution-designated entity.
Member states are also prohibited from:
Chartering or leasing vessels to North Korea, or providing crew services to North Korea or North Korean entities
Selling or supplying aviation fuel to North Korea so that it cannot be diverted to its ballistic missile program
Resolution 2270’s Monitoring Mechanisms
No new monitoring mechanisms were included in Resolution 2270.
Back to the top.
Security Council Resolution 2321
The Security Council unanimously adopted Resolution 2321 on November 30, 2016, following North Korea’s fifth nuclear test on September 9. Resolution 2321 significantly expanded sanctions on North Korea.
The full text of the resolution can be found here.
Resolution 2321’s Principal Provisions
Resolution 2321:
Calls on all members to reduce the number of staff at DPRK diplomatic missions and consular posts
Condemns the DPRK for pursuing nuclear weapons instead of the welfare of its people
Emphasizes, for the first time, the need for the DPRK to respect the inherent dignity of its people in its territory
Resolution 2321’s Principal Sanctions
Resolution 2321 imposed new sanctions that prohibit North Korea from:
Exporting minerals, such as copper, nickel, silver, and zinc
Selling statues
Selling helicopters
Selling or transferring iron and iron ore, with exceptions for livelihood purposes
Selling or transferring coal in amounts that exceed a particular cap annually
Member states were also directed to:
Limit the number of bank accounts held by diplomats and missions
Suspend scientific and technical cooperation with North Korea, except for medical purposes
Resolution 2321 also added additional items to the list of prohibited dual-use technologies and designated additional individuals and entities to subject to asset freezes and the travel ban.
Resolution 2321’s Monitoring Mechanisms
Resolution 2321 introduced a standard notification form for coal purchases from North Korea to track imports against the cap set by the resolution. The resolution also directed the Panel of Experts to hold meetings designed to address regional concerns and build capacity to implement the measures in 2321 and other North Korea sanctions.
Back to the top.
Security Council Resolution 2371
Resolution 2371 was adopted unanimously by the Security Council on August 5, 2017 in response to North Korea’s two ICBM tests in July. The United States claimed the new sanctions would prevent North Korea from earning over $1 billion each year, although some experts expressed doubt. The full text of the resolution can be found here.
Resolution 2371’s Principal Provisions
Resolution 2371:
Regrets North Korea’s massive diversion of its scarce resources toward its development of nuclear weapons and a number of expensive ballistic missile programs
Reaffirms the Council’s support for the Six Party Talks, calls for their resumption, reiterates its support for commitments made by the Six Parties, and reiterates the importance of maintaining peace and stability on the Korean Peninsula and in Northeast Asia
Decides North Korea shall not deploy or use chemical weapons and calls on North Korea to accede to the Chemical Weapons Convention and comply with its provisions
Resolution 2371’s Principal Sanctions
Resolution 2371 bans the export of several materials, which previous sanctions resolutions had restricted the export of, including:
Coal
Iron and iron ore
Seafood
Lead and lead ore
The resolution also:
Adds new sanctions against North Korean individuals and entities, including the Foreign Trade Bank (FTB)
Prohibits joint ventures between North Korea and other nations
Allows for the Security Council to deny international port access to vessels tied to violating security council resolutions
Bans countries from allowing in additional North Korean laborers
Resolution 2371’s Monitoring Mechanisms
Resolution 2371 asks Interpol to publish Special Notices on listed North Koreans for travel bans. It also gives the UN Panel of Exerts additional analytical resources to better monitor sanctions enforcement.
Security Council Resolution 2375
Following North Korea’s sixth nuclear test on September 3, 2017 the UN Security Council unanimously adopted UNSCR 2375 on September 11. The resolution, which primarily targeted North Korean oil imports, textile exports and overseas laborers, contained the strongest yet sanctions against North Korea, according to a U.S. press release. The full text of the resolution is available here.
Resolution 2375’s Principal Provisions
Reiterates its deep concern at the grave hardship that the people in the DPRK are subjected to, condemns the DPRK for pursuing nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles instead of the welfare of its people
Reaffirms its support for the Six Party Talks, calls for their resumption, and reiterates its support for the commitments set forth in the Joint Statement of 19 September 2005 issued by China, the DPRK, Japan, the Republic of Korea, the Russian Federation, and the United States
Resolution 2375’s Principal Sanctions
Resolution 2375:
Fully bans textile exports
Caps refined petroleum product imports at 2 million barrels per year
Freezes the amount of crude oil imports
Bans all natural gas and condensate imports
Prohibits member states from providing authorizations for North Korean nationals to work in their jurisdictions, unless otherwise determined by the committee established UNSCR 1718
Imposes asset freezes on additional North Korean entities, including the Organizational Guidance Department, the Central Military Commission and the Propagation and Agitation Department
Directs the 1718 committee to designate vessels transporting prohibited items from North Korea
Bans all joint ventures or cooperative entities or the expansion of existing joint ventures with DPRK entities or individuals
Resolution 2375 also added additional items to the list of prohibited dual-use technologies and designated additional individuals and entities.
Resolution 2375’s Monitoring Mechanisms
Provides further guidance for states to conduct interdictions, without the use of force, if the member states have reason to believe the vessel is carrying prohibited cargo.
If a suspected vessel refuses inspection, the flag state must direct the ship to a port for inspection or risk being designated for an asset freeze or denied port access.
Security Council Resolution 2379
The UN Security Council unanimously adopted Resolution 2397 on December 22, 2017 in response to North Korea’s ICBM launch on November 29. The full text of the resolution is available here.
Resolution 2397’s Principal Provisions
Repeats many of the principles expressed in Resolution 2375
Acknowledges that North Korean revenue generated by exports and workers overseas contribute to its nuclear weapons and ballistic missile programs
Resolution 2397’s Principal Sanctions
Caps North Korean refined petroleum imports at 500,000 barrels per year
Establishes an annual limit of crude oil imports at four million barrels per year
Obligates the Security Council to impose additional caps on petroleum imports if North Korea tests another nuclear weapon or ICBM
Directs countries to expel all North Korean workers immediately, or in two years at the latest
Bans North Korean exports of food, agricultural products, minerals machinery and electrical equipment
Bans North Korea from importing heavy machinery, industrial equipment and transportation vehicles
Designates an additional 16 individuals and 1 entity to the UN sanctions list
Resolution 2397’s Monitoring Mechanisms
Can the UN Command and Security Council play roles for peace in Korea? – UNFOLD ZERO
Photo: Lt.-Gen. Wayne Eyre, deputy commander of the United Nations Command, speaks during a ceremony on July 27, 2018, commemorating the 65th anniversary of the signing of the Korean War Armistice agreement at the truce village of Panmunjom in the Demilitarized Zone that divides the two Koreas. (Jung Yeon-je /Pool Photo via AP)
On November 1, 2018, the National Interest published an article Can the United Nations Command Become a Catalyst for Change on the Korean Peninsula? The article raises interesting questions about the role of the United Nations in supporting a denuclearisation and sustainable peace process in Korea,
The Korean peace process is being led politically by the leaders of South Korea and North Korea, in conjunction with the US administration, through agreements being reached in a series of leadership summits.
The United Nations has a key responsibility to support the process, especially through the UN Secretary-General, Security Council and the UN Command in Korea.
UN Secretary-General
UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres has spoken often to support a diplomatic solution to the Korean nuclear weapons and missiles issue (in particular the threats and counter-threats between North Korea and the USA in 2017) and in support of the peace process that started between South Korea and North Korea in early 2018. Such statements are useful encouragement, but have little legal or administrative weight.
In addition, UNSG Guterres has offered the use of UN mediation services to support the process. Such services can be very useful in a conflict regarding a specifc incidence or a simple conflict. They were used effectively, for example, by New Zealand and France to resolve the conflict over France’s bombing of the Rainbow Warrior (an environmental ship docked in Auckland harbour).
With regard to the Korean peace and denuclearisation process, the series of summits between North Korea and South Korea, and between North Korea and the USA, are probably the most promising approach for the initial stages of the process. Later in the process, the employment of the UNSG as an independent mediator might be useful, especially as the process moves towards a final peace agreement officially ending the Korean War.
UN Security Council
The UN Security Council has established a sanctions regime to put pressure on North Korea to denuclearise. As the diplomatic process progresses, graduated sanction relief will be necessary in order to provide incentives for North Korea to continue on the process, and also to enable the resumption and further development of economic cooperation especially between North and South Korea, which is vital to building a sustainable peace.
This point was highlighted by China’s Foreign Minister, Wang Yi at a UN Security Council session on North Korea on 27 September, who said that the Council should consider allowing a relaxation of some economic sanctions, if North Korea was in compliance with agreements reached in the summits between them, South Korea and the US, in order to ‘encourage DPRK and other relevant parties, to move denuclearization further ahead.”
Further, it was the UN which authorised the military action against North Korea in 1950 that launched the Korean War, a war that has not yet officialy ended. It will be important for the UN to support a peace agreement to formally end the war, once this is negotiated between the key parties.
UN Command
The United Nations Command (UNC) was established in 1950 to coordinate military action against North Korea. When the fighting ceased in 1953 and an armstice was adopted, the UNC remained in Korea to implement and oversee the armstice. In 1978, most of the armed forces of the UNC were transferred to the Republic of Korea – United States Combined Forces Command (CFC), which was taked primarily with the defence of South Korea. However, a small multinational unit of the UNC remained, with continuing responsibility to oversee the armstice agreement.
On October 22, the UNC convened a meeting at a three-sided table in the truce village of Panmumjom on the border that separates North Korea and South Korea. After a session that U.S. Forces Korea called “historic,” the UN Command announced that North and South Korea will withdraw firearms and guard posts at the Joint Security Area in the Demilitarized Zone, known as the DMZ, an operation that was completed on October 25. It was the latest effort by the two Koreas to implement the Comprehensive Military Agreement signed in September by Chairman Kim Jong-un and President Moon Jae-in at their third summit meeting in Pyongyang.
A few days earlier, in an operation also observed by the UNC commander , the two Koreas removed dozens of landmines in one section of the DMZ. And on October 26, in a separate bilateral meeting in the northern part of Panmunjom, generals from North and South agreed to demolish twenty-two of the front-line guard posts along the DMZ. They declared that all hostilities and accidental clashes along the border would be banned starting on November 1. The demilitarization project was verified by the UN Command.
These developments indicate that DPRK, ROK and the USA accept that the UNC can play an important role to oversee and verify confidence-building-measures and disarmament steps that can contribute to the Korean peace process.
As an example of the Command’s enhanced role in the peace process, the UNC has approved the movement of 5,700 people through the DMZ this year, not including the 400 or so North and South Koreans who crossed the border during the Olympics. In contrast, there were zero approvals in 2017.
“We consider the UNC to be revitalized,” says Canadian Lt. Gen. Wayne Eyre, the first non-U.S. general to serve as deputy commander of the UNC. “The Comprehensive Military Agreement is something we view as de-escalating tensions on the Korean Peninsula, and we’re working very hard as we speak to ensure its implementation.” The UNC “has a new life, new vitality and good forward movement,” he said at an October 5th event organized by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
On the other hand, there are indications that DPRK still has strong reservations about the UNC.
On November 19, 2018, the state run media outlet DPRK Today ran an article accusing the United Nations Command (UNC) of acting as an “obstacle” to the improvement of inter-Korean relations. DPRK Today said that the U.S. had contrived a plan to intervene in the implementation of the September North-South military agreement, signed as an annex to the Pyongyang Joint Declaration, through the UNC. The article cited the decision by the UNC in August to disallow South Korean trains from crossing the military demarcation line (MDL) to conduct a joint on-site survey of sections of track to be used in future rail cooperation, a decision that the DPRK attributes to ‘US meddling.’ (See UNC “obstacle” to inter-Korean cooperation, military agreement: DPRK state media, NK News).
It’s possible that the UNC decision was related more to ensuring that cross-border operations do not violate current UN sanctions. However, the DPRK criticism does point to the need for increased institutional and political clarity about the UNC’s role in supporting the peace process.
UN Security Council sets vote on tougher North Korea sanctions
Vote was called by the US after Pyongyang launched three missiles in the space of an hour on Wednesday morning, including an intercontinental ballistic missile.
The United Nations Security Council will vote on a push by the United States to strengthen sanctions on North Korea over a spate of recent ballistic missile launches, a move that China, which has a veto in the council, has said would not solve any problems.
The vote on Thursday comes a day after Pyongyang fired three missiles, including one thought to be its largest intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM), the latest in a string of banned ballistic missile launches that the country has carried out this year.
Security Council Resolution 2397, which was adopted unanimously in 2017, talked of further consequences in the event of another ICBM launch.
“That was a provision of that resolution. That’s precisely what happened and so we feel it’s now time to take action,” a senior US official told the AFP news agency on condition of anonymity.
The draft resolution would “further restrict North Korea’s ability to advance its unlawful WMD [weapons of mass destruction] and ballistic missile programmes, it would streamline sanctions implementation and further facilitate the delivery of humanitarian aid to those in need,” a US official told the Reuters news agency.
North Korea has been subject to UN sanctions since 2006, which the Security Council has steadily – and unanimously – stepped up over the years to cut off funding for Pyongyang’s nuclear weapons and ballistic missile programmes.
China and Russia, however, have been pushing for an easing of sanctions on humanitarian grounds telling a council meeting on May 11 that they wanted to see new talks and not more punishment. Russia also has a veto in the council.
“We don’t think a resolution as proposed by the US can solve any problem,” China’s UN Mission said in a statement on Wednesday evening.
China proposed in recent weeks that the US consider a presidential statement instead of a resolution, which “was supported by many delegations but fell on deaf ears of the US,” the statement said. “They know what is the best way for de-escalation, but simply resist it.”
The draft US resolution would target tobacco, crude oil and fuel exports, and expand a ban on ballistic missile launches to apply to cruise missiles or “any other delivery system capable of delivering nuclear weapons”, according to Reuters.
It would also impose an asset freeze on the Lazarus hacking group, which UN monitors said earlier this year that Pyongyang had used to steal hundreds of millions of dollars in cyberattacks.
Earlier this week, US President Joe Biden wrapped up his first visit to Asia after reaffirming the US commitment to support Japan and South Korea in the face of North Korea’s nuclear threat.
키워드에 대한 정보 kr security council
다음은 Bing에서 kr security council 주제에 대한 검색 결과입니다. 필요한 경우 더 읽을 수 있습니다.
이 기사는 인터넷의 다양한 출처에서 편집되었습니다. 이 기사가 유용했기를 바랍니다. 이 기사가 유용하다고 생각되면 공유하십시오. 매우 감사합니다!
사람들이 주제에 대해 자주 검색하는 키워드 Non-Proliferation/DPR Korea – Security Council
- UN
- United Nations
Non-Proliferation/DPR #Korea #- #Security #Council
YouTube에서 kr security council 주제의 다른 동영상 보기
주제에 대한 기사를 시청해 주셔서 감사합니다 Non-Proliferation/DPR Korea – Security Council | kr security council, 이 기사가 유용하다고 생각되면 공유하십시오, 매우 감사합니다.
